|
kucerarichard (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I don't think so...
Cashpass4ucom (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Great video, but you didn't need me to tell you that. Really opened my mind. Thanks
Globalflow (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Nice. Very nice. Great to read some of these posts too... refreshing to hear a more scholarly view of web2.0... it's application is ROCKING economics and marketing too... I don't know half of what Crashman was talking about... way too deep... but I do know Web2.0 mixed into internet marketing can replace a tenured professor's income from home in 6 months with the right grey matter applying it in creative ways... ;0)Franco
urthogie (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Sapir and Whorf are out of date and wrong.
FancoiseT (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
me too...
ghosty4ever (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'm drowning in whatever the fk u just said lol
Dadge42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This kind of scares me.
loodog555 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Nice.
Crashman2 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
HAS to, Mr Heisenberg says so...
Crashman2 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
GREAT presentation! But my degree in Linguistic Anthropology FORCES ME to ask: ALL Language and writing are LINEAR -and Messrs. Sapir and Whorf proved that as our language flows, so flows our THINKING and even CAPACITY TO THINK. Currently ppl. are HOPELESSLY cogni-bound to this linguistic linear-comms paradigm, SO: Will we ADAPT to ENDLESSLY Net-Meshed Radiant Cognition, or will we DROWN in an XML/2.0 FIREHOSE of endless-meshlinked metadata? Thinking in 2.0 MUST there4 be tot FROM BIRTH! Right? |